|
Listing
|
 |
« on: June 02, 2009, 07:53:26 PM » |
|
Hi guys I just want to hear your opinion.
I know that if I would develop a version of Visual Custom Kick that doesn't modify the ingame memory of Warcraft III
it is very unlikely that Blizzard would ban for this, like they won't ban for the Banlist as it doesn't modify the memory.
This version of VCK would only be able to kick players, what do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TwilightVoid-Mu
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2009, 03:54:21 PM » |
|
Great idea, until Blizzard decides to stop being retarded. I'm still going to continue using VCK on and off until I get banned, though. Its just one of those tools that makes hosting on Battle.net that much less painful.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
X-räi
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2009, 09:55:24 PM » |
|
it most likely wont take my time and i guess it would be quite cool. the interface doesnt modify the memory, too i guess? only read? i dunno  but i'd like to see that still implemented.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Visit D3scene.com for WC3 Tools/Bots/Strategies/Support  |
|
|
|
Listing
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2009, 06:08:30 AM » |
|
it most likely wont take my time and i guess it would be quite cool. the interface doesnt modify the memory, too i guess? only read? i dunno but i'd like to see that still implemented.... No the interface does modify the memory and therefore would not be added |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
customgamer
Newbie
Posts: 26
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2009, 12:31:40 AM » |
|
I like anything which can still kick and which actually works  but please don't stop working on the regular version then, try to keep it up as long as possible. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leadboots5
Newbie
Posts: 9
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2009, 07:17:47 AM » |
|
yes, fix the countries not updating issue as well please
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rawrz
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2009, 05:54:55 AM » |
|
I have read all the posts about Blizzard not letting people use VCK, but I am not an expert with this stuff and I don't know what Blizzard wants to block. Is the latency reducer considered a hack to Blizzard? If not, could you add the latency reducer to Visual Custom Kick Lite? Since the only function I use for VCK is latency reducer and I rarely use the custom kick because I usually play with friends.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ghost4942
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2009, 09:40:03 PM » |
|
I think so, sort of, but I think it should have an autorefresh and/or a delay reducer function kept on it with major warnings that it could ban you.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dez0
Newbie
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2009, 01:34:37 AM » |
|
The only features i use are speedstart, latency reducer and autorefresher. I hope to see these features in the new version.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
water_Knight
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2009, 04:19:23 PM » |
|
Why not make vck work the same way as ghost well in the way that you can run it use the same system they use?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ghost4942
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2009, 04:47:43 PM » |
|
Why not?? Well, if you have to use CD key for Ghost One or Ghost++, then, maybe, you have to use CD keys for a a new version of Visual Custom Kick that might make you have to use it. Ghost++ bots get disconnected after 2 minutes because of Warden, anyway, you noob, unless you use an anti-warden one just correctly and it is advanced you you could end up getting your CD keys banned. So, if a new visual custom kick system was made that had a banlist, Blizzard could try to ban people for using it to. So, I think the developer should make a new Visual Custom Kick Lite with custom kicking, but only the latency reducer and the autorefresh should also be added to it, along with the custom kicking and outside-of-game kicking functions.
Visual Custom Kick or WinPCap, or whatever it is, seems to be making my hosting lag/delay sometimes because it is bannable, and I keep having to re-download it over and over to make it work just right again. It is because of the Warcraft 3 Warden - Warden.exe. All of this is true. Also, for some reason, when most people get disconnected, I usually don't...so that is awesome, but maybe that is unrelated and has nothing to do with Visual Custom Kick or WinPCap.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JohanFoppa
Newbie
Posts: 1
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 25, 2009, 09:10:00 PM » |
|
Hi guys I just want to hear your opinion.
I know that if I would develop a version of Visual Custom Kick that doesn't modify the ingame memory of Warcraft III
it is very unlikely that Blizzard would ban for this, like they won't ban for the Banlist as it doesn't modify the memory.
This version of VCK would only be able to kick players, what do you think?
VCK is cool, but what about autorefresh? Will adding that along with kicking get you banned too? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CarnageHeart
|
|
« Reply #12 on: August 05, 2009, 02:00:14 AM » |
|
VCK is cool, but what about autorefresh? Will adding that along with kicking get you banned too?
[/quote]
Autorefresh doesn't alter any of WC3's memory so it shouldn't be an issue
Go for it Listing!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Using VCK Again Since August 3, 2009 with no ban |
|
|
Kbih
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 06, 2009, 11:40:45 PM » |
|
Yeah I agree with the above.
Stuff like Autorefresh and latency reducer are really essential in my opinion.
However, is custom kick the only thing that'll work undetected?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
T4mT4m
Newbie
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 08, 2009, 03:32:16 PM » |
|
Same here!
the 2 main aspects are "kicking lamers and hacker" and im using VCK for better game ping and more fun with online hosted games.
it really sux to play with delay and i dont understand blizz why they wanna bann VCK!
if there are enough warnings to the download on the main page (and there ARE enough)
people could decide on their own if they wanna take the risk of getting banned or not..
so in my opinion VCK should remain!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
